[identity profile] doubleoohbaby.livejournal.com 2011-09-11 10:38 am (UTC)(link)
Now that is more believable.

[identity profile] doubleoohbaby.livejournal.com 2011-09-11 10:42 am (UTC)(link)
No. I'm perfectly within the range of your type. But individually I seem to have fallen short somewhere.

[identity profile] doubleoohbaby.livejournal.com 2011-09-11 10:48 am (UTC)(link)
You may do. But I'm still right.

[identity profile] doubleoohbaby.livejournal.com 2011-09-11 11:03 am (UTC)(link)
You surround yourself with many more fair-haired, British sorts and you'll have more than just me suspicious of your preferences, my dear. Is it the accent that does it for?

[identity profile] doubleoohbaby.livejournal.com 2011-09-12 11:30 am (UTC)(link)
Your argument is rubbish. Just because I have a penchant for redheads doesn't supersede my love affair with every other sort of woman out there.

[identity profile] doubleoohbaby.livejournal.com 2011-09-12 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
My argument is that you have a type that I fit into and yet I don't happen to hold the same attraction as others, apparently. To each their own.

[identity profile] doubleoohbaby.livejournal.com 2011-09-12 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Having a type doesn't mean you go for every single 'type'.

[identity profile] doubleoohbaby.livejournal.com 2011-09-12 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Because you said I wasn't your type.

[identity profile] doubleoohbaby.livejournal.com 2011-09-12 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
There was no answer. Or question. It was just a point.